I did not accuse peanut of starting the whole thing I merely asked him to curtail the nastiness. He also complains that I sent him a message.well, if he wants me to personally reprimand him on the forum instead then I could do but I have tried to save him the embarrisment by just having a quiet word by PM. I also asked him not to come back and start trying to lay the blame on others (I did in fact also PM the other party involved too) because such things just tend to start the whole spat up again. You clearly don't read the thread before throwing your weight around as usual.
#FIRST TEA TO USE FLYING WEDGE MOD#
You are about as biased as a mod could be. I do think blunt comments suggesting that it isn't up for discussion are a little dictatorial, but then, as has been pointed out, the moderators are volunteers so why should they spend their own time justifying their actions? Perhaps it could be phrased better though? Blunt comments don't help that much when the red mist has taken hold! It helps to become a little more reasoned and no! I haven't always managed this myself. I always feel annoyed when one of my posts are removed but I think the best thing in this situation is to stand back and let the 'red mist' pass before revisiting the situation. Consequently the moderator can have quite a job at times. There will always be upsets and disagreements wherever groups meet (be it in person or over the ether) and it is much easier to be blunter through the forums than it is in person.
Level of interference from a moderator varies a great deal from forum to forum and this level helps to set the overall atmosphere.
The moderators job isn't an easy one and is not one I would ever want to do.
0 kommentar(er)
